Loading prices…

All news
News· · By 0xBurakcan· 2 min read·

Glamsterdam gas repricing: which contracts are affected and which are not

On 24 August 2026 Ethereum Foundation teams asked developers to test: the gas cost changes in the planned Glamsterdam upgrade can break contracts that rely on hardcoded gas assumptions. We set out what the announcement says and what it does not.

Share on X

In short

On 24 August 2026 the Ethereum Foundation's protocol research, EthPandaOps and specifications teams published a joint post: the planned Glamsterdam upgrade changes the gas cost of some operations, and developers are asked to check their own contracts now.

The main message is not a warning. It is a call to test.

Most contracts are unaffected

The post groups transactions by how they are affected, and says this of the group with no change:

"The large majority of transactions fall here"

So the default state is "unaffected". The group that can break is narrow and defined:

"Contracts in the last group typically rely on hardcoded gas assumptions, such as fixed stipends...hardcoded gas values in calls, logic that branches on gasleft()."

Three patterns stand out: fixed stipends, hardcoded gas values inside calls, and logic that branches on the result of gasleft(). For a contract carrying none of these, the announcement asks for nothing.

Two tools the developer has

The post gives two concrete places to go. The first is a lookup:

"you can check whether a contract may be affected by pasting the contract address into the affected-contracts search."

The second is a testnet: Platåberget (glam-devnet-8) runs the new schedule and is described as available now.

The suggested fix is in most cases simple, raising the gas limit:

"If your contract is fixable with a gas-limit increase, update the gas limits your frontend, infra, or users supply."

This does not mean the upgrade is live

The post is a preparation call. It gives no date for mainnet activation, and no such date is verified here. A testnet running the schedule does not mean the change is in force on mainnet.

Risks

Biggest uncertainty The announcement gives no mainnet activation date, and no individual contract was tested for this piece.

  1. "May be affected" is not "is affected". An address flagged by the lookup is one to check, not one that will break.
  2. A hardcoded gas assumption is a silent debt. A contract that works today can behave incorrectly, without raising an error, once the schedule changes.
  3. CryptoAlpha ran no contract tests for this piece and makes no claim that any particular project is affected.

What was not examined is listed in the data status above.

Sources

This article rests on the sources below. Whether each has a permanent copy is stated next to it.

  1. #1

    Primary source for the affected contract patterns, the lookup tool and the Platåberget testnet: the Ethereum Foundation announcement.

    blog.ethereum.org· no permanent copy· no screenshot

    open sourceopen evidence

Evidence chain: 1 sources

Tweets get deleted, sites go down. Below is whether a durable copy exists for each source.

Sources (1)

  1. #1

    Primary source for the affected contract patterns, the lookup tool and the Platåberget testnet: the Ethereum Foundation announcement.

    Contracts in the last group typically rely on hardcoded gas assumptions, such as fixed stipends...hardcoded gas values in calls, logic that branches on gasleft().

    blog.ethereum.org/2026/08/24/glamsterdam-repricing-testing
    • no durable copy: if the source disappears, this claim loses its basis
    • no screenshot captured
Back to the article

Correction history

Articles are never deleted, only corrected. Every change appears here.

  1. Version 1 ·

    Section

Glamsterdam gas repricing: which contracts are affected and which are not — CryptoAlpha